ERE registration service providers compared side by side
Certyfere vs ERE-DC
Below we compare Certyfere and ERE-DC on the factors that determine your net payout: commission, service costs, payout frequency and contract duration.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Earnings | ||
| Net per year* | €267Better value | €250 |
| Commission | 20.0%Better value | 25.0% |
| Terms | ||
| Payout | Your choice | Semi-annually |
| Smart charger | Needed | Not checked |
| Terms check | Not published by the provider (take note) | Unreadable |
| Pros and points to consider | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Points to consider |
|
|
Earnings
Net per year*
Commission
Terms
Payout
Smart charger
Terms check
Pros and points to consider
Pros
- Highest net payout in this comparison
- Lowest commission in this comparison
- None
Points to consider
- Earnings model: 20% commission on your ERE proceeds
- No terms published
- Earnings model: 25% commission on your ERE proceeds
- Terms unreadable, so not checked
- Not checked whether a smart charger is needed
Same for all: service costs none · duration 1 year · registering party registered with the NEa itself
Not checked for any of these providers: cancelling · after the term · leaving early
Estimate based on 2,500 kWh charged per year. Adjust your own usage in the comparison tool for a personalised result.
- Certyfere charges the lowest commission (20.0%) — this matters more the more you charge.
- At 2,500 kWh per year you would keep the most with Certyfere — this shifts if your usage differs.
- Which one fits best depends on your annual usage and whether you have a smart charger.
These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and can deviate from the provider's actual current offering. Always verify the latest terms with the provider before signing up.