ERE registration service providers compared side by side
Alva Charging vs ERE-DC
Below we compare Alva Charging and ERE-DC on the factors that determine your net payout: commission, service costs, payout frequency and contract duration.
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Earnings | ||
| Net per year* | €250 | €250 |
| Commission | 25.0% | 25.0% |
| Terms | ||
| Payout | Yearly, after the charging year | Semi-annually |
| Smart charger | Needed | Not checked |
| Registering party | Through ERE-registratie.nl (take note) | Registered with the NEa itself |
| Terms check | Not published by the provider (take note) | Unreadable |
| Pros and points to consider | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Points to consider |
|
|
Earnings
Net per year*
Commission
Terms
Payout
Smart charger
Registering party
Terms check
Pros and points to consider
Pros
- Your charge point doesn't have to run on Alva's platform to take part. Quote from the source: "Nee, deelname is ook mogelijk voor laadpunten buiten het Alva platform."
- None
Points to consider
- No terms published
- Registers through ERE-registratie.nl
- If your charger is linked through an outside system, that party may charge you for it. Quote from the source: "Voor koppelingen via externe systemen kunnen kosten worden gerekend door deze partijen"
- Terms unreadable, so not checked
- Not checked whether a smart charger is needed
Same for all: service costs none · duration 1 year · earnings model: 25% commission on your ERE proceeds
Not checked for any of these providers: cancelling · after the term · leaving early
Estimate based on 2,500 kWh charged per year. Adjust your own usage in the comparison tool for a personalised result.
- Both providers charge the same commission.
- Which one fits best depends on your annual usage and whether you have a smart charger.
These figures are a point-in-time snapshot and can deviate from the provider's actual current offering. Always verify the latest terms with the provider before signing up.